Search results

The Plaintiff may now present their opening statement.

The extension request has been granted for an additional 24 hours. The Defendant is asked to please respond within such times.

The Defendant, Vanguard National Bank, must present an answer to the complaint, as outlined in the Case Structure. They have 48 hours to do so.

It is asked that both parties avoid giving the court the run-around while it is deliberating a verdict. The Prosecution must make it clear that the Defendant agrees to these terms by having them respond to the thread; and the Defendant must avoid adding confusion to that regard. Please also be...

Writ of Summons Azalea Isles Civil Court (CR) Case No. CV-25-04 Plaintiff: Nim Surname (Nimq_) Defendant: Vanguard National Bank The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Nim Surname v. Vanguard National Bank. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in a...

Thank you for your closing statement. The Defendant has 48 hours to present his closing statement.

Upon the request of the Plaintiff, this case is hereby dismissed. The Court thanks both parties for their time.

The Prosecution has 48 hours to present their closing statement.

Court Verdict Azalea Isles Civil Court (CV) Case No. CV-25-02 Jebediah Crumplesnatch (Fergie_Foo) v. the Government of Azalea Isles Position of the Plaintiff 1. The Plaintiff, Jebediah Crumplesnatch, alleges that the Defendant unlawfully passed the Speakership Amendment Act through a...

Thank you for your response. I would like to kindly remind both parties to minimize editorial commentary and personal opinions in your submissions to this Court, and to focus on the factual and legal arguments as is expected. The Defendant has 48 hours to present their opening statement.

Given that James Carrington (ven0msaint) has failed to respond to the case as a witness in cross-examination, despite ample notification to do so, this leaves the Court will no choice but to find him in contempt of court. The Ministry of Justice is ordered to fine the witness $500 for failing to...

Your extension of 8 hours has been granted. You have until 8 hours, from this post, to issue a response.

The witnesses, @Luke201556 and @James Carrington, are reminded that they must respond to the Court within the next 24 hours, or else they may face charges for contempt of court. Both have been notified as of yesterday to respond:

I have thoroughly reviewed your objections regarding the contempt charge. The charge for failure to respond within the prescribed deadline was issued in accordance with the established rules of procedure. Your repeated disregard for procedural orders and statements undermining the decorum of...

At this time, the Court finds no merit in the Defendant’s motion for reconsideration, rejecting it, and upholding the contempt ruling. The Defendant’s failure to respond within the required timeframe, combined with their repeated disregard for court procedure, necessitates this decision...

Upon review, the Court will be partially striking the Defendant's words. As stated before, the first sentence you highlighted illustrates an argument in this case. The first sentence shall be taken into consideration as it contains the legal argument. The second sentence, it provides such...

The Court finds that the Plaintiff’s amendments to the complaint were made in response to procedural objections and evolving circumstances. While the Defendant argues that these changes were inconsistent, the Court does not find evidence of bad faith. As such, the Defendant's motion for...

Court Verdict Azalea Isles Civil Court (CV) Case No. CV-25-01 Nanicholls Nanicholls (nanicholls) v. the Government of Azalea Isles Position of the Plaintiff 1. The Plaintiff, Nanicholls, alleges that the Defendant, through filing the case of Azalea Isles v. Galavance (2025) CR 03, wrongfully...

After careful consideration, the Court is prepared to rule on the following objections: Motion to Strike #1: The Plaintiff alleges that the Defence factually misrepresented the phrasing of previous acts surrounding the standing orders. The Court hereby accepts this motion in part, recognizing...

Could the Plaintiff please clarify what lawful basis, whether it be precedent or statute law, is being applied in this case to justify a public apology from the Defendant? As the constitution does enshrine certain freedoms to communication, the Court is inclined to oppose an order that would...