Biscuit Cookie V. Amethyst.co (Emilozz)

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

Biscuit Cookie, Plaintiff

v.

Emilozz, Defendant



Civil Complaint:

Biscuit Cookie sold three items to Amethyst.co, resulting in a violation of the Minimum Wage Act's Supplier Pay section.

Parties:

1. Biscuit Cookie
2. Amethyst.co
3. Emilozz

Factual Allegations:

1. On August 18th, Biscuit Cookie sold gasoline to Amethyst.co for $6 (P-001)
2. The price to buy gasoline is $18 (P-002)
3. On August 18th, Biscuit Cookie resold two books sold by Amethyst.co for $40 (P-003)
4. The price to buy one book was $140 (P-003)
5. The price to buy the other was $130 (P-003)

Legal Claims:

1. The defendant has violated Section 3 "Supplier Pay" of the Minimum Wage Act.

Prayer for Relief:

1. Per the minimum wage the Plaintiff requests 50% of the buy price. Resulting in a total of $282
2. Removal or edit the chest-shops in violation to the appropriate %50 or more of the buy price.
3. Legal fees for the Plaintiff's time; as determined by the court.
4. Any other Relief the court deems just or necessary.

Evidence:

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Verification:

I, Biscuit Cookie, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.