robidemon2 v. Ministry of Justice (MOJ)

[Robidemon2]

---

Civil Complaint​

Plaintiff robidemon2 brings this civil action against the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) for slander committed by an MOJ Lawyer acting in their official governmental capacity. The lawyer made multiple false, defamatory, and reputation‑damaging statements about the plaintiff, including calling him an "Anti‑Law politician," an "alt," an "anarchist with a messed‑up political agenda," a "fraudster," and accusing him of "pausing democracy." These statements were false, and caused significant reputational harm. Although the lawyer was later terminated, the damage remains, and the MOJ is liable for slander committed by its official agent.

---

Parties​

Plaintiff​

• robidemon2 – Citizen and political participant in Azalea whose reputation was harmed.

Defendant​

• Ministry of Justice (MOJ) – Government ministry responsible for legal enforcement and supervision of its officers and lawyers.

Co‑Defendants​

• Biscuitplays- Lawyer that committed slander
• PowderUwu- Co-Consul that agreed to release the information

---

Factual Allegations​

1. Plaintiff robidemon2 is an active and recognized political participant and citizen of the Azalea Isles.
2. An MOJ Lawyer, while acting in an official governmental capacity on behalf of the Ministry of Justice, made multiple false and defamatory public statements about the plaintiff to a news organisation.
3. These statements included, but were not limited to:
   • Accusing the plaintiff of being an “Anti‑Law politician.”
   • Calling the plaintiff an “alt.”
   • Labeling the plaintiff an “anarchist with a messed‑up political agenda.”
   • Claiming the plaintiff was a “fraudster.”
   • Alleging the plaintiff “paused democracy.”
4. Each of these statements was false, known to be false, and served no legitimate governmental purpose.
5. The MOJ Lawyer made these statements publicly, causing immediate reputational harm.
6. The statements were made intentionally, with the purpose of undermining the plaintiff’s credibility and damaging his reputation.
7. The MOJ dismissed the lawyer after these actions, implicitly acknowledging misconduct.
8. Despite the termination, the harm to the plaintiff’s name, political reputation, and credibility continues, as the statements were public and widely circulated.
9. As the statements were made by an MOJ official performing official duties, the Ministry of Justice is liable for the resulting damages.

---

Legal Claims​

Claim 1 — Slander ​

1. Under Section 1 of the Slander Act, slander is defined as making false and damaging statements about someone.
2. Section 2 prohibits slander outright.
3. Under Section 3, the plaintiff may sue for slander but must prove damages and intent.
4. The MOJ Lawyer, acting under official authority, knowingly made false statements with the intent to harm the plaintiff’s reputation.
5. These actions constitute slander under the Act.
6. The plaintiff suffered reputational, political, and social damages as a direct and proximate result of the slander.
7. Under Section 5, the defendant must pay compensation of no less than $50, with the final amount determined by the Court based on severity and evidence.

---

Prayer for Relief​

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:

1. Find the Ministry of Justice liable for slander committed by its official representative.
2. Award monetary compensation to the plaintiff in an amount not less than $50, and higher if warranted by severity.
3. Grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.

---

Verification​

I, robidemon2, hereby affirm that the allegations in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.