Case: Pending Biscuit Cookie v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 27

[Aero]

Your Honour,

Section 2(d) of the Upstanding MPs Act clearly states that "For a crime to be countable for sanctions under this Act, the perpetrator must have admitted to the deed or been found guilty by the Judiciary." That provision is unambiguous: only a real admission or a judicial finding of guilt may trigger sanctions under the Act.

Exhibit D-001 does not satisfy that requirement. The statement, "I just wanted to try out the bank robbery feature," is not an unequivocal admission of criminal conduct. It is an expressive, non-factual remark made during a stressful moment and should be read as a joke or an offhand comment, not as an admission that the Plaintiff intended or committed the crime. There is no independent evidence showing planning, tools, or other conduct that would corroborate it as a confession.

To treat this brief remark as the statutory "admission" would improperly convert protected speech into proof of guilt. Article 1's protection for freedom of thought, belief and political opinion covers remarks like this; the State must produce clear, corroborating evidence before using casual or joking speech as the basis for sanctions. No such corroboration exists here.

The Court should therefore find that Exhibit D‑001 does not constitute an admission under Section 2(d) and should be excluded as the predicate for sanctions, or, at minimum, be held legally insufficient to trigger sanctions under the Act.

 

[jotoho]

Defendant, please provide your opening arguments within 48 hours.

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Your honor,

The plaintiff was found inside the vault, robbing the bank. The plaintiff was caught, inside the bank, and later logged off the game, forcing them to serve the bank robbery charge that they had received by being caught by a police officer in the bank. In response to this, the plaintiff said, "I just wanted to try out the bank robbery feature."

This is a clear admittance. The only way you can "try" the bank robbery feature is by committing the crime, unless you are an officer with the bank training command specifically to train new officers on how a bank robbery may go. There is clear evidence that this crime was not only committed, but admitted to, and therefore, sanctions should be put into effect according to the act, because all the evidence was there, according to the act.

 

[jotoho]

Thank you to both parties for your opening arguments.

I ask that each party submit within 48 hours either a list of witnesses you wish to call, or a statement that you do not wish to call any witnesses.

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Your honor,
The defense would like to call Daniel Spezi as a witness.

 

[Aero]

The plaintiff was found inside the vault, robbing the bank. The plaintiff was caught, inside the bank, and later logged off the game, forcing them to serve the bank robbery charge that they had received by being caught by a police officer in the bank. In response to this, the plaintiff said, "I just wanted to try out the bank robbery feature."

This is a clear admittance.

MOTION TO STRIKE
Your Honour,

The Defense's opening statement asserts facts and concludes guilt without foundation (e.g., "was found inside the vault, robbing the bank"; "is a clear admittance"). Those statements are not evidence, are argumentative, and risk misleading the Court. I move to strike those portions from the record and request the the Defense be directed not to repeat them. In the alternative, require the Defense to state the evidentiary basis for each challenged assertion.

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

**Response to Motion to Strike**

Your honor,

To begin, according to court definitions, this is not what a motion to strike is to be used for. In Motions and Objections, in the court library, a motion to strike is listed as
"Motion to Strike: A request to remove certain facts, claims, or defenses from the complaint or answer of the case."

This is not the complaint or answer. This is the opening statement.

Additionally, these statements are backed by Daniel Spezi, the arresting officer. This is the very person the defense has called to witness. Our opening statements were to start the case. Our witness statements will build upon this. Prior precedent for this is shown in Death Thegreatfired v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV24, where the plaintiff motioned to strike something from the opening statements of the defense and it was denied as witness testimony could later potentially back it up.

Because of this, we ask the court to deny the motion to strike.

 

[jotoho]

MOTION TO STRIKE
Your Honour,

The Defense's opening statement asserts facts and concludes guilt without foundation (e.g., "was found inside the vault, robbing the bank"; "is a clear admittance"). Those statements are not evidence, are argumentative, and risk misleading the Court. I move to strike those portions from the record and request the the Defense be directed not to repeat them. In the alternative, require the Defense to state the evidentiary basis for each challenged assertion.

**Response to Motion to Strike**

Your honor,

To begin, according to court definitions, this is not what a motion to strike is to be used for. In Motions and Objections, in the court library, a motion to strike is listed as
"Motion to Strike: A request to remove certain facts, claims, or defenses from the complaint or answer of the case."

This is not the complaint or answer. This is the opening statement.

Additionally, these statements are backed by Daniel Spezi, the arresting officer. This is the very person the defense has called to witness. Our opening statements were to start the case. Our witness statements will build upon this. Prior precedent for this is shown in Death Thegreatfired v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV24, where the plaintiff motioned to strike something from the opening statements of the defense and it was denied as witness testimony could later potentially back it up.

Because of this, we ask the court to deny the motion to strike.

Ruling on Motion to Strike

In my research, I came across recent precedent on a similar motion in the 1st Motion to Strike of Case (2026) CV24 under the Honorable Judge Milk Crack.
The Court chooses to adopt his rationale in that case and apply it to this Motion, thus respectfully denying the Motion to Strike at this time.

Should Defendant fail to substantiate these claims with evidence, the Plaintiff may make another Motion to Strike on this matter after witness examination.

In regards to the Court Library definition however, the Court will dispute the claims that Motions to Strike may only be used on the Complaint and the answer to it. While that may have been true in the past, it appears that the courts have consistently held Motions to Strike to be permissible on other court submissions.

As such, I have requested that the Supreme Court consider amending the definition for Motions to Strike in the Court Library to better reflect current court policy.

---

Plaintiff is reminded to please submit their list of witnesses or a statement that they do not wish to call any witnesses within the time frame previously set by the court.

 

[Aero]

We do not wish to call anyone.

 

[jotoho]

Writ of Summons - Witnesses

Azalea Isles District Court Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-27

Plaintiff: Biscuit Cooke (BiscuitPlaysYT)
Defendant: Azalea Isles
​

The following individuals are required to appear before the court:

• Daniel Spezi (@Ahrucrafter)

Please indicate your presence in this thread. Failure to respond within 72 hours may result in contempt of court.
​

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

 

[Ahrucrafter]

im alive, what you need?

Writ of Summons - Witnesses

Azalea Isles District Court Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-27

Plaintiff: Biscuit Cooke (BiscuitPlaysYT)
Defendant: Azalea Isles
​

The following individuals are required to appear before the court:

• Daniel Spezi (@Ahrucrafter)

Please indicate your presence in this thread. Failure to respond within 72 hours may result in contempt of court.
​

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

 

[jotoho]

the fuck you need me for now? cant i just have a peaceful Thursday for myself?

Mr. Spezi, you were summoned at the request of the Minister of Justice, who is representing the Defendant, the Azalea Isles in this case.

The Defendant wishes for you to provide witness testimony to this Court Case, and you will comply with this process and all court orders under threat of punishment. Are we clear?

The language and tone of the witness in response to being summoned are entirely unacceptable conduct.
As a consequence, this Court hereby finds the witness, Daniel Spezi, guilty of one charge of Contempt of Court under the New Criminal Code Act, for willfully disrespecting the decorum of a court of law and sentences him to 10 minutes of jail time and a criminal fine of 500$. The Ministry of Justice is ordered to execute this punishment.

---

The Defendant now has 48 hours to present questions, including follow-up questions, to their witness. Any motions or objections that might be raised will pause this timer until the Court has ruled on them. The timer will likewise be paused should the witness fail to answer to questions presented to him within 24 hours.
Should the witness fail to respond to a question within 72 hours without proper reason, it may be interpreted by the Court as failure to comply and lead to further punishment.

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Mr Spezi,

1. Were you, or were you not the arresting officer of Biscuit Cookie when he gained his bank robbery charge.
2. If you were the arresting officer, what happened during and after the detainment was made and the arrest went through?

 

[Ahrucrafter]

Mr Spezi,

1. Were you, or were you not the arresting officer of Biscuit Cookie when he gained his bank robbery charge.
2. If you were the arresting officer, what happened during and after the detainment was made and the arrest went through?

Yes, i was the arresting officer, after i arrested biscuit inside of the bank vault, he left the game shortly after i arrested him which made him automatically go to prison.

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Yes, i was the arresting officer, after i arrested biscuit inside of the bank vault, he left the game shortly after i arrested him which made him automatically go to prison.

Mr Spezi,

1. Take a look at Exhibit D-001. Do you remember this statement being made?

 

[Ahrucrafter]

Mr. Spezi, you were summoned at the request of the Minister of Justice, who is representing the Defendant, the Azalea Isles in this case.

The Defendant wishes for you to provide witness testimony to this Court Case, and you will comply with this process and all court orders under threat of punishment. Are we clear?

The language and tone of the witness in response to being summoned are entirely unacceptable conduct.
As a consequence, this Court hereby finds the witness, Daniel Spezi, guilty of one charge of Contempt of Court under the New Criminal Code Act, for willfully disrespecting the decorum of a court of law and sentences him to 10 minutes of jail time and a criminal fine of 500$. The Ministry of Justice is ordered to execute this punishment.

---

The Defendant now has 48 hours to present questions, including follow-up questions, to their witness. Any motions or objections that might be raised will pause this timer until the Court has ruled on them. The timer will likewise be paused should the witness fail to answer to questions presented to him within 24 hours.
Should the witness fail to respond to a question within 72 hours without proper reason, it may be interpreted by the Court as failure to comply and lead to further punishment.

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

I sincerely apologize for my bad behavior, my ability for proper decision making was heavily restricted at the time, i ask for forgiveness.

 

[Ahrucrafter]

Mr Spezi,

1. Take a look at Exhibit D-001. Do you remember this statement being made?

yes i can remember biscuit saying that he wanted to try out the bank robbery feature, which he said shortly after i arrested him, i also got screenshots of the chat.

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

yes i can remember biscuit saying that he wanted to try out the bank robbery feature, which he said shortly after i arrested him, i also got screenshots of the chat.

1. Was anything said before this statement to prompt Biscuit Cookie to say this.