Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of CityRP.

SignUp Now!

Latest posts

Case: Pending Anthony Org v. Ministry of Justice (2026) CV 02

Anthony_org

New member
Anthony_org
Anthony_org
Citizen
Joined
Nov 11, 2025
Messages
26

Anthony_org

v.

The Ministry of Justice


COMPLAINT :

This civil action arises from the unlawful arrest, detention, and incarceration of Plaintiff Anthony_org by employees of the Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”) without due process of law. Plaintiff was jailed without a hearing, without an opportunity to defend themselves, and under a presumption of guilt rather than innocence.

These actions violated the Constitution of Azalea Isles, specifically:
  • Article 1, Section 9 – Right to self-representation or counsel in a court of law
Plaintiff brings this action to protect constitutional rights and to prevent continued abuse of executive authority by the Ministry of Justice.


PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff:
    Anthony_org
  2. Defendant:
    The Ministry of Justice

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Plaintiff Was Arrested and Jailed Without Due Process

  1. On 1/6/2026, Plaintiff was arrested by employees of the Ministry of Justice.
  2. Plaintiff was immediately jailed without:
    • a judicial hearing,
    • a formal charge being adjudicated by a court,
    • or an opportunity to defend themselves.
  3. No court order authorizing incarceration was issued prior to Plaintiff being jailed.

B. Plaintiff Was Presumed Guilty

  1. Plaintiff was treated as guilty upon arrest.
  2. Plaintiff was not afforded the presumption of innocence.
  3. No opportunity was provided to present evidence or challenge the allegations prior to punishment.

LEGAL CLAIMS

Count I - Violation of Article 1, Section 9 (Right to Self-Representation or Counsel)

  1. Plaintiff was denied the opportunity to represent themselves or obtain counsel before incarceration.
  2. Punishment was imposed prior to any judicial process.
  3. This conduct violates Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Azalea Isles.

DAMAGES

  1. As a direct result of Defendant’s actions, Plaintiff suffered:
    • unlawful loss of liberty,
    • emotional distress,
    • reputational harm,
    • deprivation of constitutional rights.
    • over $1000 azalean dollars

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
  1. Issue a judicial finding that the Ministry of Justice violated:
    • Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Azalea Isles;
  2. Declare Plaintiff’s arrest and incarceration unconstitutional;
  3. Award compensatory damages in an amount determined by the Court;
  4. Award punitive damages in the amount of $10,000;
  5. Grant injunctive relief preventing MoJ personnel from:
    • incarcerating citizens without judicial adjudication,
    • presuming guilt prior to trial;
  6. Grant any further relief the Court deems just and proper.

VERIFICATION

I, Anthony_org, hereby affirm that the allegations in this complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.
 

Motion for Emergency Injunction​

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this court immediately enjoin the MoJ from incarcerating citizens without first giving them an opportunity to defend themselves.
 

Motion To Amend​

Your honor I'd like to amend the following sections to include a unjust jail sentence of approx. 2 hours

COMPLAINT

  • Article 1, Section 7 – The right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.

STATEMENT OF FACTS


c. Plaintiff was jailed for over 2 hours, well over the 60 minute maximum in the Criminal Code Foundation Act

LEGAL CLAIMS


Count II - Violation of Article 1, Section 7 (The right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.)

Evidence

Exhibit A)

 

Attachments

  • Exhibit A.png
    Exhibit A.png
    804.4 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:

Motion for Emergency Injunction​

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this court immediately enjoin the MoJ from incarcerating citizens without first giving them an opportunity to defend themselves.
At this time, the Court respectfully rejects this emergency injunction. Such injunction is broad, unspecific, and has not provided proper rationale to the relevance of this case.
 

Motion To Amend​

Your honor I'd like to amend the following sections to include a unjust jail sentence of approx. 2 hours

COMPLAINT

  • Article 1, Section 7 – The right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.

STATEMENT OF FACTS


c. Plaintiff was jailed for over 2 hours, well over the 60 minute maximum in the Criminal Code Foundation Act

LEGAL CLAIMS


Count II - Violation of Article 1, Section 7 (The right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure.)

Evidence

Exhibit A)

The Court is prepared to accept the motion to amend.
 

Writ of Summons

Azalea Isles District Court, Civil Case (CV)


Case No. CV-26-02
Plaintiff: Anthony Org (Anthony_org)
Defendant: Ministry of Justice
The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Anthony Org v. Ministry of Justice. Failure to respond within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. Both parties are ask to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, including proper formats, as well as the laws referenced in the complaint. Ensure that you comply with any court orders.

If you wish to hold this trial at the Azalea Courthouse in-person, please note that in your response. The Court will try to work with both parties to hold live hearings at convenient times.
Signed,
Hon. Chief Justice Raymond West
 
At this time, the Court respectfully rejects this emergency injunction. Such injunction is broad, unspecific, and has not provided proper rationale to the relevance of this case.
Motion to Reconsider

Your honor, I move to reconsider the emergency injunction. I understand the claim that the injunction is too broad so I have offered what I believe to be a feasible solution that the MoJ can implement.

a) cops bring alleged criminal to a holding cell

b) the cop reads the alleged criminal their rights and reads the charge

c) the cop asks the alleged criminal if they wish to contest these charges

d) in the event the alleged criminal contests the charges then direct them to open a MoJ ticket or have the MoJ take alleged criminal to court.

This proposal allows the MoJ to satisfy Article 1 Section 9 of the constitution during the duration of this case.
 
Back
Top