Case: Dismissed Azalean Isles v. Jory Romulus (2025) CR 08

[RealHanuta]

Ministry of Justice, Prosecution
v.
joryrusso12, Defendant

Criminal Complaint
Around the 11th of October 2025, the Defendant was seen trying to recruit officers of the law for a terrorist group, therefore engaging in Incitement, Bribery and Treason.

Parties
1. Prosecution, Hanuta Brehmer/Ministry of Justice
2. Defendant, Jory Romulus

Factual Allegations
As seen in Exhibit A, the Defendant tried to pursuade EmeraldMXR, who is a police officer in training, to join his 'private army', whose goal is to commit crimes like Robbery and Assault. While trying to get said government employee to become a part of his army, Jory Romulus offered money to him.

Legal Claims
1. Pursuading others to commit crimes is an act of Incitement, defined as 'encouraging or provoking others to commit a crime or engage in unlawful conduct.' in section 2e i of the Criminal Code.

2. The offering of money to EmeraldMXR, a police officer, is an act of Bribery, defined in more detail as 'the act of offering [...] benefits, such as money or gifts, in exchange for influencing the actions of a government official or employee.' in section 4d i of the Criminal Code.

3. The establishement of a private army, whose aim is to commit crimes and terror, is an act of Treason, also defined as '[...] conspiring to harm the nation’s security or sovereignty' in section 4e i of the Criminal Code.

Prayer for Relief
1. In accordance with section 2e iii of the Criminal Code, the Defendant shall pay a monetary fine of $30 for the crime of Incitement.

2. In accordance with section 4d ii of the Criminal Code, the Defendant shall serve 20 minutes of jail time and pay a monetary fine of $2000 for the crime of Bribery. Additionally, the Defendant shall be prohibited from running in the upcoming election.

3. In accordance with section 4e ii of the Criminal Code, the Defendant shall serve a 40 minute long jail time and pay a monetray fine of $10 000. He shall also be unable to hold any government functions in the future.

Evidence
Exhibit A
The Defendant tries to recruit EmeraldMXR for his organisation




Verification
I, Hanuta Brehmer, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

WRIT OF SUMMONS

Azalea Isles District Court

Case No. CR-25-08​

Prosecution: Azalea Isles Ministry of Justice
Defendant: Jory Romulus

The Defendant is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Azalea Isles v. Jory Romulus. Failure to do so within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. The Court asks both parties to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, appropriate formats, and the law, especially as referenced in the complaint. Please ensure all court orders are followed.

If you wish to hold this trial in person at the Azalea Isles Courthouse, indicate so in your response. The Court will work with both parties to try and hold hearings at convenient times.

Signed,
District Court Justice Fauz Wolfe

 

[Joryjman]

The defendant is present though would like to humbly request the court for an extension due to irl business.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Extension is granted. The defendant now has an additional 48 hours (a total of 96 hours from the summons) to provide an answer to the case file.

 

[Joryjman]

In the Court of the Azalea Isles

Motion for Dismissal:
Your honor this case is little more than a thinly veiled political attack. The prosecutor is running for the party against me and mine in the upcoming elections and has only brought this case forward after i declared my candidacy. In addition they are specifically seeking in section 2 of their prayer for relief “Additionally, the Defendant shall be prohibited from running in the upcoming election.” Of which the supposed authority for that punishment is derived under section 4d ii of the criminal code. A section which states regarding the punishment “(ii) This offense shall be punishable by 20 minutes of jail time and a monetary fine of $200.”. The fact that the prosecutor attempted to add this additional charge, of which there is no mention of or authority derived from within the criminal code, is the most evident proof that this case was specifically brought forward in order to interfere with the upcoming elections and my candidacy within it. In addition to the political underpinning there is little to no merit or standing to bring forward charges for any of those crimes. From the single piece of evidence provided is more than evident that the speech is never decisive in intention and absolutely falls under free speech. It is all in a joking and musing manner, with the primary word being thinking in each sentence. No dollar amounts, no solid offers, acceptances, steps to act, conspiracy, or actions performed otherwise. Even if all of those were satisfied, which they are not, it is asinine to present any of that As an attack on the state’s sovereignty or general security as presented in claim 3. If a citizen asked someone to rob another player, would that be considered treason against the government because no reasonable person would recognize that. The lack of merit for the harshest charge, which is merely intended to block my involvement in government, along with the trumped up charge under claim 2, definitively intended to prevent my election campaign, show a breach in public trust and institutional protections meant to block the politicization and weaponization of this great nations justice system. This intentional political targeting is plain and simple and i hope the court may see that and rule in my favor, and in the favor of all people for free and fair elections.

Signed,
Jory Romulus

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

The motion to dismiss is hereby denied, as this case does have legal standing. You are welcome to argue all of these statements as we progress, or bring forward your own suit if you have been wronged.

Additionally, make sure you are looking at the current criminal code, which can be found via Ministries -> Ministry of Justice -> Azalea Isles Criminal Code. I will also link it here-

Azalea Isles Criminal Code

Preamble: Below is the updated criminal code, taken from the Criminal Code Foundation Act, which follows the format outlined in the Criminal Code Reformation Act v2. The CCRA-2 also states that the Minister of Justice is in charge of updating the Criminal Code as necessary. Both acts were...

cityrp.org

The prosecution, in accordance with the active criminal code, is able to pray for a bar from running for office, and individuals found guilty of bribery could be fined $2,000.

 

[RealHanuta]

Thank you, Your Honor, for denying this motion

I would like to clear some things up and refer to the arguments the Defendant has brought forward. Firstly, whether or not the expression 'thinking' is enough to dimiss the charges as irrelevant is not a hard fact but to be decided within this case in my opinion. I do not believe that these sentences made by the Defendant fall under free speech as they show threatening contents. Second of all, the expression 'I'd pay double whatever the pd pays you' is a clear offering and therefore constitutes Bribery.

Now lastly, I want to object the Defendants statement as Improper Opinion. There is no way of knowing for the Defendant whether or not this case has a political background unless he sat next to me and could hear my thoughts when I made this post - which he didn't and biologically can't. Furthermore, the truth is - and you can believe this for we are under oath to only tell the truth and nothing but the truth - that at the time I wrote the indictment, I did not know of the Defendants candidacy. It was only brought to my attention afterwards.

An election can not undermine legal processes.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Sustained.

Mr. Romulus, let’s focus on the offenses alleged by the prosecution. As said before, you are welcome to litigate a case pertaining to your concerns given you can prove legal standing. You have about 48 hours left to present an answer to the case file.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

Your honour, Lord Jebediah Crumplesnatch - Lawpora. I will be representing the defendant in this trial.

Our response to the Case file will be posted within 12 hours.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

Motion for Sanctions

Your honour, the opposing counsel is both speaking out of turn and testifying their own views on the evidence. It is not the prosecutions opening statement, so we should not be seeing arguments from their opening statement. We do not request the remarks to be struck from the record, but we would welcome a gentle reminder to the Minister of Justice that the law has procedures, and these procedures must be followed.



Answer to Criminal Complaint:

Azalean Isles

v.

Jory Romulus, Defendant, represented by Lord Jebediah Crumplesnatch


Factual Defences or Challenges:
The defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to all charges. We also refute the ‘factual’ allegation that the single exhibit presented by the prosecution supports anything that the prosecution claims.


Despite the claims presented by the prosecution, my client committed no persuasion of an officer, my client committed no bribery, and my client committed no incitement. Not one of the charges put before the court took place. The evidence shows my client nattering about considering the creation of hypothetical organisation.



Legal Defences or Challenges:

1. The defendant is charged with Treason on the grounds of “conspiring to harm the nations security or sovereignty”, yet no evidence has been submitted showing evidence of conspiracy, nor does the evidence submitted show any indication of harm to national security or sovereignty.
2. In response to a freedom of information request intended to collect evidence to support my clients defence, the Prosecution withheld basic and fundamental information about the case, stating “Giving out information that could be used in court by a potential traitor is a risk I don’t feel good taking.” This shows the prosecution is willing to take underhand and potentially illegal actions regarding this case. With this in mind, I Motion for Sanctions against the Prosecution, once again, and request that you order them to provide the information requested in the FOI and save me the trouble of asking the Prosecuting Counsel to provide it under oath.
3. Despite the incredibly serious nature of my clients’ charges, he tells me he was not arrested. An FOI told me that the investigation began on the 11th of October, in this time my client was allowed to live freely without any idea this investigation was underway. In the same time period, a quick look at the MoJs criminal records shows arrests conducted against 6 individuals for very petty matters. The MoJ want this court to believe that they are willing to let “a potential traitor” walk free without even attempting an arrest, but those charged with assault get hunted like dogs.
4. In the evidence provided by the Prosecution, no crimes have been committed. Only the discussion of hypothetical crimes. On these grounds, I Motion for Dismissal on the grounds that Article 1.1 and 1.4 give the fundamental protections of “Freedom of Thought, belief, and political opinion.”, and “Freedom of press and media of Communication”. By allowing this case to go to continue without any additional evidence provided, you are sanctioning the breached of Fundamental Constitutional rights, and would be setting the precedent that our citizens can be imprisoned and branded a traitor for communicating their thoughts. Despite what the prosecution may or may not wish to put in place, we do not currently have any written law to litigate for thought crimes.
   
   Verification:
   
   I, Jebediah Crumplesnatch, hereby affirm that the allegations in the answer AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the defendant’s knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Sanctions is accepted, but the notion goes for your client as well, in the event he is no longer represented by you. In addition, Mr. Brehmer, the Court does not understand the reason for labeling the extent of potential discussions had about these proceedings as classified to protect the nation’s security. Unless you can convince me otherwise, I ask that you comply with the Freedom of Information request, or direct the ticket to another official who is capable of providing the information.

The motion to dismiss is denied. While Freedom of Speech is a very valued right that citizens have, certain statements are unprotected, especially if they are in violation of our active criminal code. The case will move forward to determine if the Defendant is innocent or guilty, and if these statements are protected, and only if a guilty verdict is given in this court will the Defendant be arrested and fined for such charges (given their severity).

The Prosecution has 48 hours to present their opening statement.

 

[Crumplesnatch]

Motion for Dismissal
Your honour, I motion to dismiss this case. The prosecution insisted that there was no political reasoning behind bringing this case, and yet I note they have failed to provide an opening statement in the allotted time required, and have been out on the campaign trail instead. As the prosecution clearly feels that carrying on this case within the time allowed is not its priority, I ask the case be dismissed.

Motion for Summary Judgement
In the event the motion to dismiss is not granted, I hereby request a summary judgement, for the same reasons outlined above.

Motion for Sanctions
Your honour, I am still yet to receive the information from my freedom of information request. Instead, the ticket has been closed by the prosecution. This is quite clearly contemptuous from the prosecution and a breach of the freedom of information act. A breach I will be following up in a civil case.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Since we are still in the beginning stages of the case, I will go ahead and accept the motion for dismissal. As the case is now closed, the Court asks Mr Brehmer to either share the information requested to the Defense attorney, or be prepared to defend himself in a civil suit.

The Court thanks both parties for their time.

Signed,
District Court Judge Fauz Wolfe

 

[RealHanuta]

FOI Request

Since the first part of the question was already answered as seen in the evidence, I will now proceed to the length of previous discussions. A discussion took place with the duration of 18 minutes. Another was merely a two minutes.