Case: Dismissed Biscuit Cookie v. Amethyst.co (2026) CV 36

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

Biscuit Cookie, Plaintiff

v.

Amethyst.co, Defendant



Civil Complaint:

Biscuit Cookie sold three items to Amethyst.co, resulting in a violation of the Minimum Wage Act's Supplier Pay section.

Parties:

1. Plaintiff: Biscuit Cookie
2. Defendant: Amethyst.co
3. Co-Defendant: Emilozz

Factual Allegations:

1. On August 18th, Biscuit Cookie sold gasoline to Amethyst.co for $6 (P-001)
2. The price to buy gasoline is $18 (P-002)
3. On August 18th, Biscuit Cookie resold two books sold by Amethyst.co for $40 (P-003)
4. The price to buy one book was $140 (P-003)
5. The price to buy the other was $130 (P-003)

Legal Claims:

1. The defendant has violated Section 3 "Supplier Pay" of the Minimum Wage Act.

Prayer for Relief:

1. Per the minimum wage the Plaintiff requests 50% of the buy price. Resulting in a total of $282
2. Removal or edit the chest-shops in violation to the appropriate %50 or more of the buy price.
3. Legal fees for the Plaintiff's time; as determined by the court.
4. Any other Relief the court deems just or necessary.

Evidence:

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Verification:

I, Biscuit Cookie, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[jotoho]

Writ of Summons

Azalea Isles District Court, Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-36
​

Plaintiff: Biscuit Cookie
Defendant: Amethyst.co
Co-Defendant: Emil Emilozz (Emilozz)

​

The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Biscuit Cookie v. Amethyst.co (2026) CV 36. Failure to indicate your presence within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. Both parties are asked to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, including proper formats, as well as the laws referenced in the complaint. Ensure that you comply with any court orders.

Both parties are required to inform the Court whether they consent to hold this trial, in full or in part, at the Azalea Isles Courthouse in-person.
The Court will try to work with both parties to hold live hearings at convenient times.

​

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

 

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

Your Honour,
The plaintiff does not wish to hold this try in person. The plaintiff also wishes to submit this into evidence.

Spoiler: P-004

Respectfully,

 

[jotoho]

Your Honour,
The plaintiff does not fish to hold this try in person. The plaintiff also wishes to submit this into evidence.

Spoiler: P-004

View attachment 1094

Respectfully,
View attachment 1095

The preference for a forum trial is noted.

Could you please briefly explain to the court why exhibit P-004 is relevant to this case and should in your opinion be admitted?

 

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

The preference for a forum trial is noted.

Could you please briefly explain to the court why exhibit P-004 is relevant to this case and should in your opinion be admitted?

Your Honour,
The evidence I wish to submit shows the defendant reaching out to me; in attempt to harass or change my opinion about this case. I ask the court to allow it's submission.

With Respect,

 

[jotoho]

Your Honour,
The evidence I wish to submit shows the defendant reaching out to me; in attempt to harass or change my opinion about this case. I ask the court to allow it's submission.

With Respect,

View attachment 1096

The request to admit exhibit P-004 into the evidence is hereby respectfully denied. The Court neither sees nor has been provided with any meritorious reason for its legal relevance to this case.

None of the conduct depicted in P-004 appears to be illegal or otherwise worthy of reprimand. Generally speaking, the Judiciary of Azalea Isles even encourages parties of civil disputes to seek out-of-court solutions where possible.

 

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

The request to admit exhibit P-004 into the evidence is hereby respectfully denied. The Court neither sees nor has been provided with any meritorious reason for its legal relevance to this case.

None of the conduct depicted in P-004 appears to be illegal or otherwise worthy of reprimand. Generally speaking, the Judiciary of Azalea Isles even encourages parties of civil disputes to seek out-of-court solutions where possible.

Your Honour,

The plaintiff asks the court to reconsider. It seems to misunderstand; the defendant did not wish to settle and instead just wished to harass the plaintiff.

 

[jotoho]

Your Honour,

The plaintiff asks the court to reconsider. It seems to misunderstand; the defendant did not wish to settle and instead just wished to harass the plaintiff.

Denied. The Court respectfully sees no harassment within P-004, just what seems to be a polite request by the Defendant to consider leniency.

 

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

Denied. The Court respectfully sees no harassment within P-004, just what seems to be a polite request by the Defendant to consider leniency.

Motion to Dismiss
I have been paid. The chests have been removed. I thank the court for its time.

Respectfully,

 

[jotoho]

Motion to Dismiss
I have been paid. The chests have been removed. I thank the court for its time.

Respectfully,
View attachment 1097

Thank you for informing the court. This case is dismissed with prejudice.