Case: Pending Aero Nox v. Azalea Isles (2025) CV 15

[fauzfauzfauz]

Thank you Your Honor. I will alert future filers of this information as well to ensure the contents of their statements align with the definition of the amicus.

The Defense has 24 hours to provide a response to the injunction, and it shall be reconsidered.

 

[Robidemon2]

Motion for Default Judgment:
Your Honor, the defendant is yet to answer to answer to the original case filing and more than 48 hours have passed I move for a default judgement specially considering the expedited nature of the trial.

 

[xXLordLyonXx]

Injunction Response

Your Honor, I reiterate my previously voiced concerns. Assuming the power to pause elections as a District Court Judge, with no basis in statutory law or in the Constitution, is a significant expansion of power for the judicial branch, especially given this is a District Court case.

Additionally, the Plaintiff ignores the wording of 5th Fundamental Protection. "The right to vote and participate in elections as specified by law." The right to vote, and to participate in elections, is governed by the law. With the passage of the Electoral Reform Amendment, which grants the authority to manage Voter Registration to the government, this clearly gives the Azalea Isles Government the power to regulate voter registration through law.

This suit was brought after voting for the election opened, and Your Honor must also consider harm issued to the rest of the Azalea Isles. Even with 24 hour response times (which are not guaranteed due to real-world circumstances), there will be opening statements, likely witnesses, closing statements, and certainly motions in between. It is extremely likely that this case could go on for another week, perhaps two, and while that would be fast by legal standards, it unjustly harms the rest of the Azalea Isles who fairly voted during the election, and the candidates, who will now have their time in office diminished every day the court case goes on.

With the concern of the precedent this could set; the fact that the claim of a violation of the Plaintiff's rights is questionable at best due to the clear wording of the Constitution; and the fact that this is a by-election for one seat; we ask that the injunction be reversed, so that the election results may be finalized while the case moves forward. This will also provide the proper time for thorough, clear legal arguments to be made in advance of the next parliamentary election, rather than attempting to rush a case over one seat (11% of Parliament).



Default Judgement Response

The Defendant has responded to this case, and is waiting to file the formal answer to the complaint until all necessary motions and discussions, including what has been initiated by the Plaintiff, are resolved, as precedent allows, most recently evidenced by Vontobel v Ministry of Urban Development, tried in the Supreme Court.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

The injunction will stay in place for now. Because you do bring up notable points, I will be happy to reevaluate at a later time, especially if there is a significant disturbance to our citizens. I would not have paused the election if it were a general one, as I do not believe the pros of protecting against alleged damages as the matter is litigated could outweigh the cons of a total legislative/governmental halt.

The motion for a default judgement is denied. The Defendant had a 24 hour period to provide an argument against the injunction, hence the wait. A response was filed within the time frame, so the trial is to continue.

 

[Robidemon2]

Motion for Default Judgment:
Your Honor, the defendant is yet to answer to answer to the original case filing and more than the 24 allotted hours ,under the expedited notice, have passed I move for a default judgement specially considering the time sensitive nature of the case.

 

[xXLordLyonXx]

Response

Your Honor has not indicated the Defendant should provide an answer to the case complaint, and Your Honor just sanctioned the counsel for the Defendant in another case for responding prior to being asked to do so.


Motion For Sanctions

The Defendant has been clearly and actively engaged with the court on this case. This is the second Motion for Default Judgement the Plaintiff has filed, accusing the Defendant of not responding, when we have followed prior precedent and the law in addressing motions, court order requests, and appeals first, and have not been assigned a new request / timeline after these items have been addressed. This being the second time this has happened is cause for concern.

 

[Robidemon2]

Your Honour
Defendant does not seem to be familiar with basic case structure, he has failed to provide an answer and has wasted your time and mine, not only that he has delayed justice past whats acceptable (and past your earlier judgement). A default judgement must be provided if we are to maintain the decorum and structure of the court, otherwise we are setting a dangerous precedent.

 

[fauzfauzfauz]

Both motions are denied. As stated before in my Court, both parties are welcome to submit a motion at any time, regardless of what stage the case is in. Mr. Robi, the Defense counsel is very familiar with court structure, but since a reminder is needed after every ruling I give, I will be sure to provide that. The counsel in a different case was reminded to await my summons into the Court, not to await my permission to talk after the case has begun. Given that both parties tend to send a few messages before I can even respond to one, and without my indication, as both did here, that fact should be evident.

The Defendant has 24 hours to present an answer to the case file.