Case: Pending Azalea Isles v. Anthony Org (2026) CR XX

[multiman155]

Azalea Isles, Prosecution

v.

Anthony Org, Defendant​

Criminal Complaint:​

On November 3, 2026, Anthony Org filed an official declaration seeking election to Parliament as a member of the Azalea Solidarity Party (ASP), without ASP's approval. Earlier that day, ASP's leader had publicly stated that Org was not an ASP member and that ASP was not contesting the election. Org nevertheless claimed ASP candidacy and filed under the party's name.

Org intended to stand for ASP without its approval and took a substantial step toward that offense by submitting the required declaration. His insufficient monthly playtime prevented his inclusion on the ballot. Prosecution charges Attempt under Section 17(a) of the New Criminal Code Act, with Electoral Fraud (Misrepresentation) under Section 11(a) as the underlying offense.

Parties:​

1. Prosecution: Azalea Isles (Represented by Multi Man, Deputy Minister of Justice)
2. Defendant: Anthony Org (Anthony_Org)

Factual Allegations:​

1. At 12:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time (UTC-4) on Friday, October 30, 2026, the official thread for the October 2026 Parliamentary Election was posted. The thread stated that the election would take place from October 30, 2026, to November 7, 2026. (Exhibit P-001.)
2. The election thread instructed candidates to declare by replying in the following format:
   

   "I, <username or character name>, declare that I will be seeking election to a [district name] seat in Parliament as <an independent or party name>. I sign this declaration from <address>"

   (Exhibit P-001.)
3. The same instructions stated: "If you are running on behalf of a party, please ensure you have the permission of the party to run under their banner." (Exhibit P-001.)
4. The Azalea Solidarity Party is a registered political party led by Ryan Moose (MoosePatrol10). (Exhibit P-002.)
5. At 8:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time (UTC-5) on Monday, November 2, 2026, Royal Assent was recorded for the Ancillary Offenses and Public Integrity Act. Section 1(b) provides that the Act takes effect immediately upon Royal Assent. The Act added the attempt offense in Section 17(a) and the substantial-step definition in Section 3(u) of the New Criminal Code Act. (Exhibit P-006.)
6. At 1:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Defendant publicly stated that he "declared under ASP." (Exhibit P-004.)
7. At 1:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Ryan Moose publicly stated, "I confirm for public record that anthony_org is not an ASP member." (Exhibits P-002 through P-004.)
8. At 1:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Ryan Moose posted in the Azalea Solidarity Party's registration thread in the Ministry of State Discord: "ASP is re registering it party as we are not contesting this election but still active." (Exhibit P-002.)
9. At 10:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Defendant publicly stated that he was "running as an ASP candidate." (Exhibit P-003.)
10. At 11:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, Defendant posted the following declaration in the official election thread:
    

    "I, Anthony_org, declare that I will be seeking election to a District 1 seat in Parliament as an memver of the Azalea Solidarity Party (ASP). I sign this declaration from b025."

    (Exhibit P-001.)
11. At 4:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on Wednesday, November 4, 2026, the election administrator posted a notice quoting Defendant's declaration and identifying him as excluded (hereafter the "Exclusion Notice") from the ballot for failure to meet at least one eligibility requirement. The Exclusion Notice listed citizenship duration, playtime, disqualification from public office, and district residence as possible unmet requirements. Within the playtime requirement, the Exclusion Notice bolded the words "at least ten (10) hours" describing the monthly threshold. (Exhibit P-005.)
12. The election administrator's District 1 voter roll lists Anthony_org. Defendant's declaration sought election to the District 1 seat. (Exhibit P-001.)
13. The playtime screenshot included in the Exclusion Notice shows Defendant with total playtime of 9 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, and 9 seconds and monthly playtime of 4 hours, 14 minutes, and 48 seconds. The displayed total exceeds the 24-hour cumulative requirement for candidates; the displayed monthly figure falls below the 10-hour monthly requirement. (Exhibit P-005.)
14. Defendant had been a citizen of Azalea Isles for more than one week before the electoral period began on October 30, 2026. (Exhibit P-005.)
15. When voting opened, Defendant owned or rented property within Azalea Isles as a resident. (Exhibit P-001).
16. Defendant was not subject to an adjudicated criminal punishment disqualifying him from public office in this election.
17. Defendant intended to stand for the Azalea Solidarity Party in October 2026 Parliamentary Election.
18. Defendant took a substantial step towards standing for the Azalea Solidarity Party in the October 2026 Parliamentary Election.
19. Defendant knowingly took that substantial step without the permission of the Azalea Solidarity Party.

Legal Claims:​

Azalea Isles charges Anthony Org with the following crime under the New Criminal Code Act (NCCA):

1. Attempt. New Criminal Code Act, Section 17(a).​

Section 17(a) defines Attempt as follows:​

(a) Attempt​

(i) Offense Type: Capital or Felony, as provided in subsection (e).​

(ii) Penalty: Up to one-half of each maximum penalty prescribed for the underlying offense, calculated under subsection (e).​

(iii) A person commits an offense if the person:​

(1) intends to commit an underlying offense and takes a substantial step toward committing it.​

Section 3(u) defines a substantial step as "conduct beyond preparation that strongly confirms an intent to commit an offense." Prosecution must establish that Defendant intended to commit the underlying offense and took a substantial step toward committing it.​

Section 11(a) defines the underlying offense as follows:​

(a) Electoral Fraud (Misrepresentation)​

(i) Offense Type: Felony​

(ii) Penalty: 15 minutes jail time; $1,000 fine​

(iii) A person commits an offense if the person:​

(1) stands for a political party without their approval or knowledge.​

A. Defendant lacked approval from the ASP to stand in an election for that political party.​

Section 11(a) of the NCCA prohibits standing for a political party without its approval or without its knowledge (as did the text of the Electoral Crimes and Registration Act before it). These are alternative grounds. A party's discovery of an unauthorized candidacy does not supply approval. Treating knowledge as a substitute for approval would permit a candidate to defeat the approval requirement simply by publicizing the unauthorized candidacy to the political party; such a reading would substantially violate the anti-surplusage canon that "statutes must be interpreted so that every provision has effect" as articulated in Luke Thegreatfired v. Lysander Lyon (2026) CV 09, Post No. 8, because knowledge would be required for approval to actually be given and the approval piece would be rendered completely moot. The Court should reject that reading and enforce the prohibition on standing without party approval owing to the law's "purpose, legislative history, and absurdity of other interpretations" (Kendall Hamilton v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 26).​

ASP did not authorize Defendant to stand in its name. Ryan Moose, ASP's leader, publicly stated that Defendant was not an ASP member and that ASP was not contesting the election. Those statements directly contradict Defendant's claim to represent ASP in that election. Prosecution will further establish ASP's lack of authorization through Mr. Moose's factual testimony at trial. (Factual Allegations 4, 7-8; Exhibits P-002 through P-004.)​

B. Defendant had intent to stand for the ASP in the Parliamentary election.​

Defendant intended to obtain a place on the ballot as an ASP candidate without the party's approval. His repeated public claims and formal declaration establish that purpose. He first announced that he had declared under ASP, later described himself as an ASP candidate, and then filed the official declaration naming ASP as his party. Defendant continued to assert he was running under ASP and so formal filed following the ASP leader's public denial of Defendant's membership and announcement that ASP was not contesting the election. Defendant's repeated assertion of ASP candidacy, followed by his use of the official filing procedure, demonstrates deliberate pursuit of an unauthorized candidacy. (Factual Allegations 6-10; Exhibits P-001 through P-004.)​

C. Defendant took a substantial step towards standing for the ASP in the Parliamentary election.​

Defendant took the step the election instructions required to submit a candidacy: he posted the prescribed declaration in the official election thread, identifying his district, party, and address. That submission put his unauthorized ASP candidacy before the election administrator. He completed the filing itself and, in doing so, strongly confirmed the purpose expressed in his public statements. This conduct went beyond preparation and satisfies Section 3(u)'s definition of a substantial step. (Factual Allegations 2-3, 6, 9-10; Exhibits P-001, P-003, and P-004.)​

D. Defendant's attempt to actually stand for ASP in the Parliamentary election was frustrated only due to low monthly playtime.​

Insufficient monthly playtime caused Defendant's exclusion from the ballot. The election administrator's notice included a screenshot showing total playtime of 9 days, 2 hours, 7 minutes, and 9 seconds, comfortably exceeding the 24-hour cumulative requirement. The same screenshot showed monthly playtime of only 4 hours, 14 minutes, and 48 seconds, below the 10-hour monthly requirement. The notice specifically emphasized that monthly threshold by placing it in bold text. The figures and the administrator's emphasis identify the eligibility failure that stopped Defendant's candidacy. (Factual Allegations 11 and 13; Exhibit P-005.)​

Defendant met the remaining personal eligibility requirements. He was listed on the administrator's District 1 voter roll and declared for that district's seat. He met the cumulative playtime requirement, had been a citizen for more than one week before the electoral period began, owned or rented property as a resident when voting opened, and was not subject to a criminal punishment disqualifying him from public office. Monthly playtime was his sole failed personal eligibility requirement. But for that shortfall, Defendant would have been included on the ballot. (Exhibit P-005; Factual Allegations 10-16.)​

The election administrator's rejection of Mr. Org from the ballot, however, does not defeat the attempt charge. Section 17(a) requires criminal intent and a substantial step, both of which Defendant demonstrated through his pursuit of an unauthorized ASP candidacy and formally filing to stand. The eligibility screening prevented his candidacy from reaching the ballot but it did not erase the attempt he had already committed.​

E. Jurisdiction.​

The Attempt provision took effect upon Royal Assent of the Ancillary Offenses and Public Integrity Act on November 2, 2026. Defendant filed his declaration on November 3, 2026. The charged filing therefore occurred after the crime of Attempt was effective. (Factual Allegations 5 and 10; Exhibits P-001 and P-006). The underlying offense is Electoral Fraud (Misrepresentation) under Section 11(a) of the NCCA. It is a felony that is not an ancillary offense and is therefore an underlying offense within the meaning of Section 3(t). Section 17(e) classifies this charge of Attempt as a felony because the underlying offense provides no penalty of disqualification from public office. The District Court has original jurisdiction under Sections 2(b) and 3(a), (d) of the Judiciary Act.​

Prayer for Relief:​

1. Prosecution asks that the Court find Defendant GUILTY of the crime of Attempt.
2. Consistent with Section 17(a)(ii) of the NCCA, Prosecution seeks 7.5 minutes in jail and a fine of $500, representing half of each maximum penalty prescribed for the underlying offense of Electoral Fraud in Section 11(a)(ii) of the NCCA.

Evidence:​

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Parliament - ELECTION OCTOBER 2026, Page 1

See attached file "Election - Parliament - ELECTION OCTOBER 2026 _ CityRP_compressed.pdf" for archive.

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

Azalea Solidarity, Party Registration Forum, Ministry of State Discord

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Solidarity, Campaign Forum, Main CityRP Discord

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Political Forum, Main City RP Discord

Spoiler: Exhibit P-005

Parliament - ELECTION OCTOBER 2026, Page 2

See attached file "Election - Parliament - ELECTION OCTOBER 2026 _ Page 2 _ CityRP_compressed.pdf" for archive.

Spoiler: Exhibit P-006

Ancillary Offenses and Public Integrity Act, Forum Thread

See attached pdf "Bill_ Ratified - Ancillary Offenses and Public Integrity Act _ CityRP_compressed.pdf" for archive.

Verification:​

I, Multi Man, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint and all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the prosecution's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

 

[Anthony_org]

You caught me at a very Japanese time of my life