Case: Dismissed Biscuit Cookie v. Ministry of Justice (2026) CV 42

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

If the Plaintiff now requests dismissal, you may be required to pay the Defendant's legal damages in the amount determined by the court.

Do you still wish to move for Dismissal?

If and when the Plaintiff affirms the motion, the Defendant may reply to the Motion to Dismiss within 48 hours, if they wish.

If the court insists the plaintiff will affirm and provide necessary relief as determined by the court. However it is in the belief of the plaintiff that the defendant made a separate motion to dismiss and in doing so supported a dismissal without relief.

Respectfully,

 

[multiman155]

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL
Your Honour,

Things have came up. I’m busy and no longer see reason to continue a fight in court.

The plaintiff willingly asks the court to dismiss this case. Apologising to the court and the defendant for time wasted on this.

Sincere Apologies, Regards, and Best wishes;
View attachment 1258

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE AZALEA ISLES
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS​

---

Your Honor:

Plaintiff has apologized "to the court and the defendant for time wasted" and now seeks dismissal while Defendant's motion to dismiss is pending a ruling. Defendant agrees with Plaintiff that the Plaintiff has wasted the time of the Court and the Defendant in filing this case, but disagrees with any proposed solution here to dismiss without remedy (and, implicitly, without prejudice).

Defendant maintains that Plaintiff's case is without legal merit, as noted in the various reasons given in Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We are concerned that dismissing the case without prejudice or without relief would leave the Plaintiff's meritless case open to re-filing at a later time, without any compensation for our time spent in motion practice and without any deterrent to Plaintiff's future wasting of Defendant's and this Court's time. Plaintiff cannot be allowed to short-circuit the pending motion and dodge the consequences of Plaintiff’s time-wasting litigation by filing for dismissal one week after Defendant did.

Defendant therefore would pray that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's case with prejudice and the award Defendant legal fees at a rate of $1,000 per week since the summons was issued.

---

 

[BiscuitPlaysYT]

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE AZALEA ISLES
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS​

---

Your Honor:

Plaintiff has apologized "to the court and the defendant for time wasted" and now seeks dismissal while Defendant's motion to dismiss is pending a ruling. Defendant agrees with Plaintiff that the Plaintiff has wasted the time of the Court and the Defendant in filing this case, but disagrees with any proposed solution here to dismiss without remedy (and, implicitly, without prejudice).

Defendant maintains that Plaintiff's case is without legal merit, as noted in the various reasons given in Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We are concerned that dismissing the case without prejudice or without relief would leave the Plaintiff's meritless case open to re-filing at a later time, without any compensation for our time spent in motion practice and without any deterrent to Plaintiff's future wasting of Defendant's and this Court's time. Plaintiff cannot be allowed to short-circuit the pending motion and dodge the consequences of Plaintiff’s time-wasting litigation by filing for dismissal one week after Defendant did.

Defendant therefore would pray that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's case with prejudice and the award Defendant legal fees at a rate of $1,000 per week since the summons was issued.

---

Your Honour,

I apologise for my conduct by speaking out of turn though to save the court’s time.

The plaintiff agrees with the defendant and asks the court to impose a relief of $1,000 per week ($2,000 since the summons was issued) and dismiss with prejudice.

With Respect,

 

[jotoho]

Order of Dismissal​

In light of the Motions to Dismiss filed by both case parties, the Court hereby dismisses this case with prejudice.

Given that the Defendant had to spent significant resources to defend against claims that will now not be substantiated by the Plaintiff in court, the Court hereby orders that the Plaintiff pay the Defendant, the Ministry of Justice, legal damages in the amount of $2000 within 7 days and provide proof of payment to the Court.

If the Plaintiff does not do this within the deadline given, the Ministry of Justice may seize the legal damages from the Plaintiff by means such as the /fee command instead.

The Court thanks both parties for their time.

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir