Case: Dismissed Ryan Moose v Azalea Isles (2026) CV 29

[MoosePatrol10]

Ryan Moose, Plaintiff
v.
Azalea Isles, Defendant

Civil Complaint:
The Government Internship Act imposes clear non-discretionary requirements on the government which they have failed to execute

Parties:

1. Plaintiff: Ryan Moose
2. Defendant: Ministries in the Azalea Isles

Factual Allegations:

1. Last March, the Parliament of the passed and ratified the Government Internship Act with immediate enforcement
2. The government has since failed to establish internship position and has not advertised it anywhere
3. When asked of why the government has not established an internship position, it was claimed that there is no need for internship positions because citizens can get a regular job already. But, section 2(a) of the Act strips the government of all discretion regarding internship creation, directly stating: ""Every Ministry of the Azalea Isles Government shall maintain no fewer than two (2) Government Internship positions at all times.""
4. Ministers said that the law was ""dumb"" and were offered recourse to repeal the law. They have not taken this action despite the law passing in March and it presently being June

Legal Claims:

1. The word ""shall"" constitutes an absolute legal duty that the government has not undertaken even when the law was passed months ago. The government does not have the authority selectively ignore laws
2. The Government Internship Act outlines non-compliance enforcement in section 4 that have not been followed
3. Because of this, the Plaintiff was deprived of opportunity to apply for internship roles as they were not advertised or listed anywhere

Prayer for Relief:

1. Writ of mandamus to compel the government to abide by the Government Internship Act and maintain no fewer than 2 internship positions at a time
2. Writ of mandamus to compel the Ministry of Justice to file charges against all willful non-compliance of the Act as called for in section 4
3. Legal fees paid to the Plaintiff in line with the Damages Reform Act

Verification:
I, Ryan Moose, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

Government Thread 'Government Internship Act'

Mar 12, 2026

Original Legislation:
Passed Bill Link: https://www.cityrp.org/threads/government-internship-act.3199/
Final Vote: 6-3-0
Ratified: March 12, 2026

---

Author(s): Anthony_org, Unity Master, Robi Hawes
Sponsor(s): Unity Master MP

​

Government Internship Act
Preamble: It is important that new citizens are given opportunities to learn governmental functions, integrate into public service, and participate meaningfully in civic life. A formal internship framework promotes transparency, fairness, and accessibility while ensuring Ministries...

• Library of Parliament
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Acts of Parliament

 

[jotoho]

Writ of Summons

Azalea Isles District Court, Civil Case (CV)

Case No. CV-26-29
​

Plaintiff: Ryan Moose (MoosePatrol10)
Defendant: Azalea Isles

​

The Defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Ryan Moose v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 29. Failure to indicate your presence within 48 hours may result in a default judgement. Both parties are asked to familiarize themselves with the relevant court documents, including proper formats, as well as the laws referenced in the complaint. Ensure that you comply with any court orders.

Both parties are required to inform the Court whether they consent to hold this trial, in full or in part, at the Azalea Isles Courthouse in-person.
The Court will try to work with both parties to hold live hearings at convenient times.

​

Signed,
Hon. Judge Iturgen "jotoho" Bolir

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Your Honor,

The Azalea Isles Government represented by the Ministry of Justice is present and I will be working as prosecutors for this case.


Sincerely,
Phoenix Flamesong
Minister of Justice

 

[Phoenix Flamesong]

Motion to Dismiss

Your Honor,

The defense is motioning to dismiss the case due to a lack of standing. In Anthony Org v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 15, it was ruled that "To establish standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury." The plaintiff has not demonstrated a concrete and particularized injury. Therefore, the plaintiff has no standing in this case.

 

[jotoho]

The Plaintiff has 48 hours to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, if they wish, before the Court proceeds to rule on it.

 

[MoosePatrol10]

Your honor,

I request that the court deny the Defense's motion to dismiss. The Defense misapplies the ruling in Anthony Org v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 15.

The injury here is both concrete and real. The Government Internship Act directly mandates the creation of public service opportunities for citizens who have immigrated within the preceding two (2) months. As the Plaintiff I am a citizen under that definition who actively sought to apply for these statutory positions to integrate into public service.

By failing to create or advertise a single position the Defendant completely blocked me as the Plaintiff from exercising the legal right to apply. I could not submit a formal application because the Defendant made doing so physically impossible. Even the ministers said that they were not following this law because it is ""bollocks""



To rule that a plaintiff lacks standing because they didnt apply to a position the government refused to actually create would allow the government to evade all judicial review simply by entirely ignoring its duties. I asked about the law and the government admits there was no internship position available because they disagree with the law.

By not enforcing the law the government has directly aggrieved me as the Plaintiff as I was deprived of opportunity to apply for internship roles since were not advertised or listed anywhere. The injury is specific to lost career and civic opportunitys. Therefore, standing is met and the case should proceed to the merits.

 

[jotoho]

Motion to Dismiss

Your Honor,

The defense is motioning to dismiss the case due to a lack of standing. In Anthony Org v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 15, it was ruled that "To establish standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury." The plaintiff has not demonstrated a concrete and particularized injury. Therefore, the plaintiff has no standing in this case.

Your honor,

I request that the court deny the Defense's motion to dismiss. The Defense misapplies the ruling in Anthony Org v. Azalea Isles (2026) CV 15.

The injury here is both concrete and real. The Government Internship Act directly mandates the creation of public service opportunities for citizens who have immigrated within the preceding two (2) months. As the Plaintiff I am a citizen under that definition who actively sought to apply for these statutory positions to integrate into public service.

By failing to create or advertise a single position the Defendant completely blocked me as the Plaintiff from exercising the legal right to apply. I could not submit a formal application because the Defendant made doing so physically impossible. Even the ministers said that they were not following this law because it is ""bollocks""

View attachment 847

To rule that a plaintiff lacks standing because they didnt apply to a position the government refused to actually create would allow the government to evade all judicial review simply by entirely ignoring its duties. I asked about the law and the government admits there was no internship position available because they disagree with the law.

By not enforcing the law the government has directly aggrieved me as the Plaintiff as I was deprived of opportunity to apply for internship roles since were not advertised or listed anywhere. The injury is specific to lost career and civic opportunitys. Therefore, standing is met and the case should proceed to the merits.

Ruling on Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff argues that a concrete injury exists because they 'actively sought to apply' to internship position under the Government Internship Act, however neither the Case Filing nor the Response to the Motion to Dismiss contains proof of or alleges the existence of any such application, nor was the Court able to find such an application in the #jobs discord channel in the CityRP Server.

Instead, Plaintiff argues that they "could not submit a formal application because the Defendant made doing so physically impossible.", however this appears to be blatantly untrue.
Applicants can freely compose the title and contents of their applications in #jobs and are not, for example, restricted to a predefined list of Ministry-created options. I am aware of several instances where individuals successfully applied to positions which were either not formally documented or newly created for the applicant in response to their application.

Additionally, the Government Internship Act preserved full Ministerial discretion on which applicants to appoint to internship roles, and which to reject, only saying that these positions "must be actively available for appointment, and searching for appointees."
Thus, the claim that Plaintiff was injured in "lost career and civic opportunities" does not appear to logically follow, since there was never any guarantee that Plaintiff would have been appointed, had they applied to an internship position.
Nor has Plaintiff made any attempt to explain why the opportunities they were allegedly deprived of would be any greater than those still available to Plaintiff, given that internships, according to the Act, provide equal pay, opportunities and responsibilities as their non-internship counterparts.

As such, the Court finds that at this time, Plaintiff does not possess standing, due to lack of a concrete and particularized injury and dismisses this case without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile should standing be gained in the future.

 

[MoosePatrol10]

Thank you for your time, your honor.