Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of CityRP.

SignUp Now!

Aero Nox v. Azalea Isles

Aero

Member
Aeronox4
Aeronox4
Citizen
Joined
Nov 13, 2025
Messages
424
Aero Nox, Plaintiff
v.
Azalea Isles, Defendant

Complaint

Sections 12(a)(iii) and 12(a)(iv) of the New Criminal Code Act as amended by The Criminal Contests Act strip a defendant of their Constitutional rights to due process.

Parties:​

  • Plaintiff: Aero Nox
  • Defendant: Azalea Isles

Factual Allegations:​

(All dates and time are in Eastern Daylight Time, which is UTC-4.)

1. On May 18, 2026, The Criminal Contests Act was ratified. (Exhibit P-001)​
2. The Criminal Contests Act amends the New Criminal Code and adds the following two sections.

Section 12(a)(iii): If a suspect has a resisting arrest charge, they are deemed a flight risk and wave their right to contest.
Section 12(a)(iv): If a suspect is found to be guilty of a crime, while still having a ticket open to contest another crime, the contest shall be invalidated and the suspect will be guilty of the crime they were seeking to contest.​
3. Section 12(a)(iii) strips a defendant's right to due process by removing their ability to contest a charge, thereby resulting in an automatic finding of guilt by the Ministry of Justice.​
4. Section 12(a)(iv) links a defendant's guilt in one charge to a conviction in an unrelated charge.​

Legal Claims:​

I. Due Process

Section 12(a)(iii) automatically strips a defendant of the ability to contest a charge. That deprivation of a procedural right denies the defendant’s right to meaningful access to adjudicative proceedings.

II. Presumption of Innocence

Section 12(a)(iv) nullifies a pending contest by presuming guilt for the contested charge based on the determination of guilt for some other crime. This violates the presumption of innocence and the accused's right to be convicted only after proof beyond a reasonable doubt on each charge.

Prayer for Relief:​

1. A declaratory judgment that Sections 12(a)(iii) and 12(a)(iv) are unconstitutional;​

2. Award costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.​

Verification:​

I, Aero Nox, hereby affirm that the allegations in the complaint AND all subsequent statements made in court are true and correct to the best of the plaintiff's knowledge, information, and belief and that any falsehoods may bring the penalty of perjury.

Evidence​

 
Back
Top